Time to place a travel embargo on Europe
I know, I know, at least hear me out.
The only two countries that I have ever traveled to are
Canada (which, lets be honest, does not count) and Costa Rica (in 1998). I
would love to travel the world. Ireland, Italy, Australia, New Zealand, South
Korea, Vietnam, Japan, Chile, Egypt, Israel and the list goes on and on.
Unfortunately, we as Americans need to have the talk about potentially placing
an embargo on ourselves from traveling overseas, in particularly
Europe.
I am sure you first thought after reading that sentence is
"Barrett, there is no way I am going to let the terrorist win, I am going
to live my life and no one is going to stop me!" Well pat yourself on the
back. Sadly, I will probably be reading about your tragedy in my briefs in the
future. I have gone back and forth with this very topic, because A) one of the
things my wife and I talk about often is our desires to see the world and B) my
wife has traveled abroad in the last 2 years to some of the places I am going
to talk about. The straw that broke the camel's back for me as far as putting
hand to keyboard is the tragic bombing of Egypt Air 804 on May 19th from Paris
bound for Cairo. The fact is that Europe, crippled by liberal political
correctness, cannot be counted on to place security above political
correctness, and until that changes, incidents such as Egypt Air will
continue.
Let us try and take a 30,000 ft viewing of the situation
that is happening in Europe. According to BBC news "More than a million
migrants and refugees crossed into Europe in 2015, compared with just 280,000
the year before. The scale of the crisis continues, with more than 135,000
people arriving in the first two months of 2016." Of course the initial
response to me will be "what do you want these countries to do? Turn away
women and children?" That is another post for another day. There are
several factors to consider when looking at this statement;
Why
are they coming?
What
do they intend to do when they get here?
Why are they coming? In the case of these migrants and
refugees, it is to escape the damage done by U.S and Western Interventionism?
(I'm looking at you former Secretary of State Clinton) If that is the case then
motives will play a huge factor in the following points. Progressives will the
famously spout the line "we are a nation of immigrants" in the faces
of people like me who oppose open door immigration policy. Partially their
statement is correct, the majority of our population can trace their lineage to
another country, but that is the end of the validity of their statement. Your
parents, grandparents, great grandparents all willing came to the United
States. Was their strife and discontent in their country, of course! I only
have to cite my Irish linage and the great potato famine of1845-1849 as an
example. However, when the choice was made, your ancestors as well as mine made
the decision to come to a new country for the chance of a new start, and catered
to the expectations of their new home. Did they take traditions with them, all
I will ask is where were you on March 17th? The point of this seamlessly random
tirade is demonstrate the problem in Europe. Europe is allowing a massive
influx of a people who do not share the same language, customs or religion with
the native population. Their goal is not to integrate with the current culture,
it is to REPLACE the current culture. They are coming to these countries by
necessity, not choice.
How many of you think what I just wrote was hate speech? OK,
let’s expound upon that last point I made. They are coming to these countries
because it is an exit out of their house that is on fire. They are not choosing
these countries, which makes a huge difference. Think back to your ancestors.
When they came to these United States, the expectation was that you learned
English so you could find a job. If you objectively looked at what these
migrants/refugees are doing in these new countries, it is eerily similar to
what is referred to in Islam as a “Hijra”. According to Andrew
Bieszad, “In
Islamic law and applied theology, the idea of the hijra pertains to
the movement of a group of Muslims from a predominately Muslim area to a
predominately non-Muslim area, with the goal of establishing Islam’s dominance
in it.” Now look at spread of sharia courts throughout Europe. Britain alone
has 85
sharia courts. Instead of assimilation, this new wave of migrants has
become the new authority.
This is all paranoid
and Donald Trumpian Barrett, but what does that have to do with traveling to
Europe? As this new population settles into their new surrounds, with no
expectations of conformity, it impacts day to day life. The airport that Egypt
Air few out of recently found that 57
employees with access to airliners were on a terror watch list, according to a
report. I am not saying that every Muslim is a terrorist, but what about
their relatives or associates? We have problems here in the U.S airline system,
such as four
former Delta Air Lines baggage workers -current and former- have been arrested
for allegedly smuggling guns and ammunition from Atlanta to Brooklyn so you
cannot tell me that when cultural pressures meet unchecked opportunity that a potential
disaster is bound to happen.
My
job is emergency management, the first thing you can do to avoid an emergency
is to not place yourself in the situation to begin with. You can take this with
a grain of salt, but I ask you to objectively look at this, you will see not
all is well with our allies across the Atlantic. Maybe we should abstain from
their countries until this is worked out.
Good
Luck and Good Hunting.
No comments:
Post a Comment